Well, in the last post I started to consider the thoughts of building my own computer from a spare 386 CPU I had liberated from an old motherboard.
One of the issues I face is implementing the bus protocol that the 386 uses, and decoding of interrupts. The 386 expects an 8-bit interrupt request number that corresponds to the interrupting device. I’m used to microcontrollers where you use a single GPIO line, but in this case, the interrupts are multiplexed.
For basic needs, you could do it with a demux IC. That will work for a small number of interrupt lines. Suppose I wanted more though? How feasible is it to support many interrupt lines without tying up lots of GPIO lines?
CANBus has an interesting way of handling arbitration. The “zeros” are dominant, and thus overrule “ones”. The CAN transceiver is a full-duplex device, so as the station is transmitting, it listens to the state of the bus. When some nodes want to talk (they are, of course, oblivious to each-others’ intentions), they start sending a start-bit (a zero) which synchronises all nodes, then begin sending an address.
While each node is sending the same “bit value”, the receiving nodes see that value. As each node tries sending a 1 while the others are sending 0’s, it sees the disparity, and concludes that it has lost arbitration. Eventually, you’re left with a single node that then proceeds to send its CANBus frame.
Now, we don’t need the complexity of CANBus to do what we’re after. We can keep synchronisation by simple virtue that we can distribute a common clock (the one the CPU runs at). Dominant and recessive bits can be implemented with transistors pulling down on a pull-up resistor, or a diode-OR: this will give us a system where ‘1’s are dominant. Good enough.
So I figured up Logisim to have a fiddle, came up with this:
Interrupt controller using logic gates
interrupt.circ is the actual LogiSim circuit if you wanted to have a fiddle; decompress it. Please excuse the mess regarding the schematic.
On the left is the host-side of the interrupt controller. This would ultimately interface with the 386. On the right, are two “devices”, one on IRQ channel 0x01, the other on 0x05. The controller handles two types of interrupts: “DMA interrupts”, where the device just wants to tell the DMA controller to put data into memory, or “IRQ”s, where we want to interrupt the CPU.
The devices are provided with the following control signals from the interrupt controller:
| Signal |
Controlled by |
Description |
| DMA |
Devices |
Informs the IRQ controller if we’re interrupting for DMA purposes (high) or if we need to tell the CPU something (low). |
| IRQ |
Devices |
Informs the IRQ controller we want its attention |
| ISYNC |
Controller |
Informs the devices that they have the controller’s attention and to start transmitting address bits. |
| IRQBIT[2…0] |
Controller |
Instructs the devices what bit of their IRQ address to send (0 = MSB, 7 = LSB). |
| IDA |
Devices |
The inverted address bit value corresponding to the bit pointed to by IRQBIT. |
| IACK |
Devices |
Asserted by the device that wins arbitration. |
Due to the dominant/recessive nature of the bits, the highest numbered device wins over lesser devices. IRQ requests also dominate over DMA requests.
In the schematic, the devices each have two D-flip-flops that are not driven by any control signals. These are my “switches” for toggling the state of the device as a user. The ones feeding into the XOR gate control the DMA signal, the others control the IRQ line.
Down the bottom, I’ve wired up a counter to count how long between the ISYNC signal going high and the controller determining a result. This controller manages to determine which device requested its attention within 10 cycles. If clocked at the same 20MHz rate as the CPU core, this would be good enough for getting a decoded IRQ channel number to the data lines of the 386 CPU by the end of its second IRQ acknowledge cycle, and can handle up to 256 devices.
A logical next step would be to look at writing this in Verilog and trying it out on an FPGA. Thanks to the excellent work of Clifford Wolf in producing the IceStorm project, it is now possible to do this with completely open tools. So, I’ve got a Lattice iCE40HX-8K FPGA board coming. This should make a pretty mean SDRAM controller, interrupt controller and address decoder all in one chip, and should be a great introduction into configuring FPGAs.
Seems Vicis has had a similar idea, their 
Recent Comments