January 2006

Modern OSes on ancient hardware

Yep, I’m guilty of doing this sort of thing… take a 13 year-old piece of kit like an SGI Indy, and chuck Linux 2.6 with KDE 3.5 on it. But how about this…

A group of individuals, with seemingly too much time on their hands, have successfully managed to run Windows XP on as little as 8MHz clock speed and 16MB RAM. See this page for more details.

Now I’m really tempted to get my 386 back out of the garage, and try KDE 3.5 on it. 😉

Update: I tried this the other day. After spoon-feeding the box with floppies (nfsroot didn’t want to work, largely because the eepro driver was looking for my LAN card on IRQ 11 instead of 10), and spending all day watching tar -xjvpf stage3-hardened-x86-2005.1.tar.bz2 run its course, I’ve come to the conclusion I had before I attempted the procedure.

With a speed of just over 4 (bogo)Mil instructions/sec, and numerous 80486+ instructions creeping into the Python and sshd binaries, I’ve decided it’s not worthwhile. I might try kernel 2.4 on it later (it used to run Slackware 8.0 w/ kernel 2.4.18 just fine), but right now it’s my Gentoo-powered footrest.

RANT: Telemarketers, and their opt-out calling lists.

Yep, I’m sure everybody knows what I’m on about… it’s those annoying people, that ring just as you’re about to take a bite of your hot dinner … or wake you up/disturb you in the middle of the day, to sell you something you’re not interested in.

I’ve endured it for quite some time now. Somebody rings on the landline phone (thankfully they haven’t touched my mobile), and starts their marketing blurb. Sometimes they’ll ask for a “Mr Longland” … and after further probing, maybe I can get a “D G Longland” out of them (being my father’s phone line, he’s listed in the phonebook, and this is where they get the number from). Depending on my mood, I’ll either be highly synical or flippant, or I’ll play dumb.

Each time it happens though, I still can’t help but think … they’re doing it all wrong. Just because a number is in the phone book … that doesn’t instantly give them the right to use it to make an unsolicited commercial phonecall. At the moment for us here in Australia, there are two options:

  • Request our number to be made silent. This would prohibit anyone from publishing your phone number basically. But this wouldn’t stop those call centres that just hit +6173 then throw 7 more random digits on the end. It’s also an inconvenience for people who know us.
  • Get added to the ADMA Do Not Call List. Now this will help cull calls from crowds that are a member of this association … but what about others?

I thus propose another solution.

Rather than just calling anyone, then having people opt-out of the service… instead… people should opt-in to receiving calls. This is how it’d work.

  1. A telemarketing company puts out an advert in the media (radio, TV, newspapers…etc.), listing possible service areas that people might be interested in, as well as a phone number for people to contact for more information. Let’s say for the example, this crowd are in contact with mobile phone carriers, internet providers, mortgage crowds, and a few other companies.
  2. People who are interested then ring this number. An operator (or a computer) answers, and gives them the rundown of the services available.
  3. The caller then selects the services they want, along with specifying a preferred contact phone number and times to call.
  4. The company then adds the caller to their call-list.

This has a number of advantages:

  • Their people no longer get abused by people who aren’t interested.
  • They pay less to run the companies, because fewer calls are wasted.
  • Customers here about the services they are interested in, and may attract more by word-of-mouth.

Disadvantages:

  • There’s an additional cost to pay for adverts (which is offset by fewer calls)
  • Harder for new players to become established.

Maybe if companies took this approach… fewer people would be needlessly disturbed… and they might become more successful as a result. 🙂